Jump to content

Poll: Population Density


Actaeon

Recommended Posts

It is possible that such a poll has been conducted before, but as the demographics of the board are plastic, I see no harm in posting this.

 

There is, I'm told, a innate desire in most human beings to move to the city, a place that, they say, is full of possibilities. I don't see it, but I suspect I'm the odd man out.

 

So I'm curious. Where have you ended up? Is it where you would have chosen for yourself, given a choice?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to also ask if you HAVE a choice, and which places you have lived in, and to look at the data together.

 

I'm willing to bet that a substantial portion of our suburbs-dwellers are teenagers who do not have an actual choice, and who also have never lived anywhere else. That will surely have an impact on, and therefore correlate with the answers to, the question of which is most appealing.

 

Myself, I've lived in urban, suburban, and rural areas. Each has their appeal and their problems, but I am most troubled by the isolation of rural areas and most pleased by the activity of a city. (This, even despite being hugely misanthropic and introverted.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second question is, admittedly, not terribly well thought out. Experience helps some, "urban" can be Rome or it can be Pittsburgh. Small towns range from Maycomb, Alabama (or a nonfictional counterpart) to Aspen, Colorado. Perception plays a huge roll, and polls are helpful for measuring perception.

 

If Slarty had designed the poll, I'm sure it would be more complete. As it is, I will rely on the forum itself to explore the nuances of the terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've lived in urban, suburban, and rural areas. Rural is too isolated for my tastes. Suburbs can either be blighted wastelands or lovely areas, and they can either be distant sprawl or merely extensions of an urban center.

 

—Alorael, who would prefer to stay urban or suburban (periurban, really). He'd pick urban in a nice city, and (usually) suburban in a bad one. And not New York.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After several years in Boulder, I have come to appreciate small town life even more. The absence of chain stores and restaurants, the easy walk to everything (grocery store, dentist, vet, etc), the tendency to run into people you know in the store or on the street...

 

I'm spoiled, though. Proximity to Aspen gives me access to a range of arts and culture to rival most small cities, without having to live there. I'd probably be more down on rural life if it were otherwise. Although the public land would probably win the day, even so.

 

Edit:

3965117104_59de0a7300.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in an urban area, although it's not a huge city, hence why it styles itself as "The Biggest Little City in the World." When I'm not in school I live in a rural town.

 

I prefer urban mostly because of the size and things to do; however, urban areas tend to have much worse air quality and not as many bike trails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live, as many know, in a rural part of Montana. Not quite tinfoil-hat crazy people living in the woods, but close. I know those people, if it counts.

 

You may think the country is nice, people, but it isn't. Stay in Suburbia and/or your apartment. You have no idea how annoying it is to have to drive thirty miles to buy stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Randomizer
All the comforts of urban civilization without those annoying people. smile
Originally Posted By: Dantius
Originally Posted By: Lilith
i am boring as dirt irl and therefore live in a suburban development where i belong


^


That about sums it up. I like the availability of interaction, but I don't want to be surrounded by people 24 7. That said, as Slarty pointed out, I'm still living with my parents. I would prefer to live somewhere a bit more familiar, though. I think what's wrong is not so much location, however, as time. Those nice suburbs where all the kids are out playing and the parents all know each other and talk daily? What happened to those? Do they still exist? Here in my part of Maryland, it seems as though people are afraid to be out of their house unless it's for work or their children's school/sports.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Master1
Here in my part of Maryland, it seems as though people are afraid to be out of their house unless it's for work or their children's school/sports.


When I lived in Maryland, I was afraid to go outside. To be fair though, I think I lived in a more city-ish area, and strangers had a tendency to yell at me when I did. Then I went to uni in a tiny town on top of a mountain, which I liked, and probably would have appreciated more if I knew how to drive/had a car. Now I'm living in a smaller city, and it's definitely my favourite so far. I haven't had any strangers yell at me and it's very pretty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Micawber
Perhaps someone can explain to me what exactly distinguishes suburban from urban. Because I am having some difficulty deciding how to classify my current address.


I classify a location as suburban if your place of residence has land that you own and can use as you like- like a yard.

So an apartment wouldn't really count as suburban, even if it was in the "suburbs".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Acteon
No corner drug store or butcher in the suburbs.

That makes no sense. I just drove home through an area consisting mostly of houses on their own plots of land and passed both of those things. The drugstore was a chain drug store (and they tore down my preferred gas station to build it), but still, light commercial areas are a perfectly normal thing to have in suburban areas.

I think your characterization is overly narrow and probably based observing housing developments built in the last few decades. These are frequently vast areas containing nothing but private homes, and inside one you can be a number of miles from the nearest business. This is very different from the suburbs where I grew up, which were built about a hundred years ago with a much finer granularity of districting. In fact, I think the nearest business to my parents' house in an architecture firm, which occupies the old train station about five blocks away. The nearest grocery store was in a commercial area about eight blocks away for many years, until the chain to which it belonged was bought out by another and shut down.

I would say that Dantius is on the right track with his definition, but it still needs a bit more refinement, since, for one thing, it encompasses rural areas as well. (After all, if you live on a farm you definitely have land of your own which is like a yard, but larger. You probably have a yard, too.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suburban areas are usually considered towns that spring up around a large city and dependent upon it. Most are self contained, but the jobs the workers go to are in the city.

 

The distinction blurs a bit with more modern cities that have expanded in the last 50 years. When you have an old established city like New York, Chicago, or Washington, D. C. the lines are clear cut between the city and the suburbs. Then you have the weird twin cities that expand towards each other like Minneapolis-St. Paul and Dallas-Fort Worth with their own collections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suburbs are the regions that the urbanites look down on. Urban areas are the regions that have urban cred. And tautology is good for you.

 

—Alorael, whose favorite suburb, using the term loosely, is Brookline. It's almost totally enveloped by Boston. It's definitely urban. But it's not the city itself, so what could it be besides a suburb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, we can talk about what is "officially" a city versus "officially" a suburb because it is next to a city. But really what we care about is what is FUNCTIONALLY a city or a suburb.

 

I think this is a case where there is no cut-and-dry definition, but nonetheless there are few areas that would be on the fence about being city or suburbs. I think the following characteristics are all true of MOST urban and MOST suburban areas: thus, a given suburb might have one or two city characteristics but would likely have mostly suburban ones.

 

URBAN

- High population density

- Buildings are set very close to each other

- Most residences are apartment buildings or multi-family homes

- Public transportation exists on most major streets

- Commercial staples such as grocery stores within walking distance of most residential areas

- Not everyone relies on cars, but cars seem to be everywhere due to the population density

- Sidewalk is everywhere

- Most adjacent cities/towns are smaller

 

SUBURBAN

- Low to moderate population density

- Houses may have more than one driveway's width between them

- Residential areas have mostly single-family homes

- Public transportation may exist but it is limited

- Commercial staples may not be within walking distance

- Most adults rely on cars to get around

- Sidewalk likely on most streets

- Most adjacent cities/towns are of similar size

- Shopping malls / strip malls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Change world? Change mind.
—Alorael, whose favorite suburb, using the term loosely, is Brookline. It's almost totally enveloped by Boston. It's definitely urban. But it's not the city itself, so what could it be besides a suburb?

Parts of Brookline have mansions and giant houses, are indistinguishable from Newton, and are definitely suburban. Parts of it have close-set apartment complexes and a subway line and are no less urban than large Boston neighborhoods like Dorchester or JP.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: HOUSE of S
I think this is a case where there is no cut-and-dry definition


That's what I thought. What makes it difficult is I recently moved not much more than 1-2 miles away, and 'instinctively' I would describe my old address as suburban but my new address as urban, just due to the character of the two places. Happily this ties in with nearly all the indicators Slarty listed. Those same indicators explain why I prefer to live urban than suburban. Plus it's cheaper.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Arch-Mage Solberg
... I live (by road) some 9 or 10 miles from the city of Manchester, TN...


I lived just outside of Readyville, Tn for a while. I loved it. When I needed to go to the store I went to the 1 store in Readyville, When I wanted to go to town for groceries, I went a little farther to Woodbury. If I needed a town with a Wal*Mart, I went a little farther to Murfreesboro, and if I wanted to get to the city, I went all the way to Nashville.

Now I live outside of Poulsbo, Washington but ride a motorcycle and a ferry boat to get to work in Seattle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...