Easygoing Eyebeast Sullust Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 Good morning fellow sinners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 If this is what a post-rapture world is like, then wow, Left Behind got it wrong in addition to being a terrible book. I really should try and get my money back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall A less presumptuous name. Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 So the whole thing with the Rapture occurring at 6pm local time. Why would any sort of divinity respect our arbitrary lines and rules governing what we think is "time?" Also, have any of our Australian members noticed any extra bodies in the skies? No? Weird, I thought we'd finally get a doomsday prediction right! Unless, of course, no one in the Eastern Hemisphere is worth saving!* *This is not meant to start any sort of race/nationalistic war. It just hasn't happened over here yet, so I can't rule any Western Hemisphere residents out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Sarachim Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the Rapture is scheduled for 6:00 PM. We East Coast sinners have at least six hours to go before we inherit the Earth, though any SWers in Eastern Europe, Asia, or Australia are already living in the kingdom of the Antichrist. Can any of them weigh in on how things are going so far? (I seriously did not make that part of the prediction up.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Jerakeen Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 Here is my doomsday prediction: Something very bad will happen to some people at some time. When it does, you will all have to admit that I'm a prophet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dintiradan Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 Everyone knows that the world will end on January 19th, 2038, at 3:14 AM UTC. EDIT: I love how the whole timezone thing introduces a loophole into the event. Someone could spend the morning in Vancouver, then catch an afternoon flight to Tokyo, crossing over the international date line. Apparently there's a group of people who were planning on buying a bunch of second-hand clothes and laying them out on the sidewalks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Jerakeen Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 A co-worker recently showed me a sum she apparently thought was deeply significant: Quote: 09 11 01 date of 9/11 03 10 11 date of Japanese earthquake 12 21 12 date of the end of the world, according to the Mayan calendar. Torn between pointing out the foolishness of trying to use to completely unrelated and dissimilar events to predict a third, and the absurdity of giving dates from the Gregorian calendar some kind of numerological significance, especially in relation to the Mayan calendar, I settled for correcting her sum: Quote: 09 11 2001 03 10 2011 12 21 4012 In which case, no worries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dintiradan Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 2001 + 2011 = 4012 ( :-P ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 I hear that the rapture is supposed to arrive at 6 p.m. local time, but I'm unsure how this interacts with daylight savings time. This means that I don't know exactly when to check around for people vanishing, which is annoying since I'd rather not miss the event while eating dinner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 I'm kind of unclear as to the difference between God "rapturing" people and god simply killing them and their souls going straight to heaven/Purgatory. If it's the latter case, why not simply kill everyone in one fell swoop, sort 'em into heaven and hell, and skip out on the whole tribulations bit entirely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Understated Ur-Drakon Callie Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 This guy predicted the world would end in 1994, so it's funny that anyone takes him seriously. Edit: Actually, it's funny that anyone takes any doomsayer seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk nikki. Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 Originally Posted By: Dantius I'm kind of unclear as to the difference between God "rapturing" people and god simply killing them and their souls going straight to heaven/Purgatory. If it's the latter case, why not simply kill everyone in one fell swoop, sort 'em into heaven and hell, and skip out on the whole tribulations bit entirely? I guess by doing it through time zones, He's hoping to avoid unnecessary queues at the gates. I don't see what the fuss is about though - everybody knows that Atomic is Blondie's best song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 I remember on the day of The Rapture in the 1980s when it was supposed to happen in Tucson, Arizona a friend telling us that he just thought of a great money making idea. It was too late to sell "I survived the Rapture" tee shirts. Wake me up when it really happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 You're not the only one. It's supposed to be painless, and thus certainly beats out death by torture, cancer, etc. Nevertheless, it's in all meaningful ways identical to (quick, painless) death, and so I count myself pretty perplexed at people rhapsodizing about being raptured up to heaven "before they die." @Randomizer: was that the furor over Edgar Whisenant's 88 Reasons the Rapture Will Be in 1988? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 I think it was an earlier one since it was a local group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Ah, apparently the Rapture's time has been moved to midnight in Jerusalem. The one fixed date and time does make more sense, but the switching doesn't exactly lend credibility to them. Besides, don't the PMD's think that there's going to be some big nuclear exchange between Israel and Russia a few years before the Rapture happens? You'd think that's not the kind of thing that we would miss... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Quote: Besides, don't the PMD's think that there's going to be some big nuclear exchange between Israel and Russia a few years before the Rapture happens? You'd think that's not the kind of thing that we would miss... Different sect of PMDs, clearly. With a different completely literal reading of the bible. Let's not forget that Russia is supposed to be supported by its powerful ally, Ethiopia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 at least ethiopia has delicious food going for it i mean, when they have food at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Originally Posted By: Niemand Let's not forget that Russia is supposed to be supported by its powerful ally, Ethiopia. When I read that bit in the book, I got this odd feeling like the authors initially wanted to put something in about voodoo magic or pagan rites or some other racist nonsense as a justification, but the editor just put his food down there. I really can't understand why else they would include Ethiopia in it at all, since the other pairing I've heard of outside of Left Behind is Russia and Germany, which makes much more sense. Well, more sense than Russia and Ethiopia, that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast The Mystic Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Originally Posted By: Dantius If this is what a post-rapture world is like, then wow, Left Behind got it wrong in addition to being a terrible book. I really should try and get my money back. Then I guess it's a good thing I never read that book. Also, good luck getting a refund. Originally Posted By: Excalibur This guy predicted the world would end in 1994, so it's funny that anyone takes him seriously. Edit: Actually, it's funny that anyone takes any doomsayer seriously. Yeah, I don't think the world ended in 1994. Or, for that matter, any other predicted date that's now in the past. What really amazes me is that it's usually not just one or two people that take a doomsayer seriously; sometimes it's a cult. Originally Posted By: The Turtle Moves A co-worker recently showed me a sum she apparently thought was deeply significant: Quote: 09 11 01 date of 9/1103 10 11 date of Japanese earthquake 12 21 12 date of the end of the world, according to the Mayan calendar. Torn between pointing out the foolishness of trying to use to completely unrelated and dissimilar events to predict a third, and the absurdity of giving dates from the Gregorian calendar some kind of numerological significance, especially in relation to the Mayan calendar, I settled for correcting her sum: Quote: 09 11 200103 10 2011 12 21 4012 In which case, no worries. That reminds me of a prediction that the world was going to end in 1998, because it's a multiple of 666 (666 * 3 = 1998). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 I question your assumption that Left Behind had editors. Anyway, the inclusion of Ethiopia (and this whole Russian attack narrative) comes from Ezekiel 38 & 39. "Persia, Cush, and Put will be with them, all with shields and helmets." -Ezekiel 38:5, NIV. "Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet." -Ezekiel 38:5, KJV. There are a bunch of nations, probably including Eastern Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and a few in Sub-Saharan Africa. Russia is actually one of the more controversial and questionable members, since there's no direct reference to it, unlike some of the others. It's the nation usually associated with 'Gog,' for various reasons that I can elaborate on if it interests people. @Niemand: I'm not sure these ones even qualify as PMDs anymore. PMDs seem pretty locked into the 7 years of tribulation, whereas these guys think the tribulation lasts 23 years, and that the antichrist is largely symbolic. Also, who here reads Fred Clark's LB commentaries on Slacktivist/Patheos? They're pretty excellent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 The Slactivist commentaries on LB are several times longer than the book itself. They are also filled with win- I read them a couple years after I read the book itself, and the criticisms were spot-on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 He's most of the way through Tribulation Force at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Quote: Also, who here reads Fred Clark's LB commentaries on Slacktivist/Patheos? This is the source of all my knowledge of the dreck that is LB. It's been a while though, so some of my recollections of details are a bit fuzzy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Sarachim Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Originally Posted By: FnordCola Also, who here reads Fred Clark's LB commentaries on Slacktivist/Patheos? They're pretty excellent. *raises hand* Extremely excellent, even, but my family wonders how I know so much about the subject. Quote: I question your assumption that Left Behind had editors. IIRC, according to those commentaries, Jerry Jenkins writes each book in about a month, so even if they had editors there would be no time for any major revision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast keira Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 I had a weird rapture-related dream in which Saint Peter was actually Gandolf, and he kept shouting "You Shall Not Pass!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Rowen Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Oh, was that today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Originally Posted By: Sarachim Jerry Jenkins writes each book in about a month daaaaaaang even Mills and Boon give their authors 6 weeks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Balladeer Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Yeah, what Rowen said. Not worth the time it took to read this thread. Doomsday predictions are dumb and always wrong. When the world does end, there will be no countdown for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 Doomsday predictions go back millenia. At least for this one there was a fee service that would retrieve and take care of your pets within 24 hours in the event you weren't Left Behind. In the 1800s, the Millerites slaughtered their farm animals to "save them" when they thought the End was coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 22, 2011 Share Posted May 22, 2011 But we can learn so many interesting things about social systems and individual psychology from people's beliefs about the end of the world! Then again, I wrote my thesis on Dispensationalism, so I may have somewhat odd tastes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast The Mystic Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Randomizer In the 1800s, the Millerites slaughtered their farm animals to "save them" when they thought the End was coming. I remember hearing about that one. They believed that since there would be no one left on earth, their livestock would all die from starvation and neglect, so they killed the animals as an act of mercy. When the end of the world failed to materialize, had I been one of Miller's followers, I would've demanded, among other things, compensation for the loss of the animals. I also would've locked Miller in the nearest nuthouse, welded the door shut, and melted all copies of the key. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 I don't think that's fair. William Miller didn't coerce anyone into believing in his eschatology, and he certainly didn't force them to slaughter their livestock. I'm sympathetic to the idea that apocalyptic preachers ought to be held accountable for their statements, but there also seems to have been very little malice or selfishness in Miller's preaching. From what I've read, he seemed genuinely to believe that he'd calculated the time of the end, and those who believed him did so basically because they accepted (whether based on reason or fiat) his argument. If a scientist or other public intellectual makes a visible and seriously faulty prediction, said person should be named and shamed for doing so, and their credibility diminish accordingly, but that doesn't mean they're a lunatic or a charlatan. And many Millerites did see this as a basically scientific endeavor: an attempt to derive a set of predictive principles from a body of evidence. I don't agree that the Bible is a valid body of scientific evidence, and don't even get me started on this numerology silliness, but I can't fault their intentions. Or, to put it another way: if the sole basis for getting a public maker of predictions committed was to show that they had been wrong in harmful ways, the fields of economics, political punditry, and popular psychology would be entirely empty, and research psychology and the natural sciences greatly reduced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: FnordCola if the sole basis for getting a public maker of predictions committed was to show that they had been wrong in harmful ways, the fields of economics, political punditry, and popular psychology would be entirely empty not really seeing the down side here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dantius Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Lilith Originally Posted By: FnordCola if the sole basis for getting a public maker of predictions committed was to show that they had been wrong in harmful ways, the fields of economics, political punditry, and popular psychology would be entirely empty not really seeing the down side here First they came for the Austrian economists, and people were like "Okay, cool."? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Dantius Originally Posted By: Lilith Originally Posted By: FnordCola if the sole basis for getting a public maker of predictions committed was to show that they had been wrong in harmful ways, the fields of economics, political punditry, and popular psychology would be entirely empty not really seeing the down side here First they came for the Austrian economists, and people were like "Okay, cool."? Still not seeing the downside. Consider it "Evolution in Action" or cleasing the gene pool for all those that haven't won Darwin Awards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrulous Glaahk Venom Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Randomizer Originally Posted By: Dantius Originally Posted By: Lilith if the sole basis for getting a public maker of predictions committed was to show that they had been wrong in harmful ways, the fields of economics, political punditry, and popular psychology would be entirely empty not really seeing the down side here First they came for the Austrian economists, and people were like "Okay, cool."? Still not seeing the downside. Consider it "Evolution in Action" or cleasing the gene pool for all those that haven't won Darwin Awards. Oh, how pathetically short-sighted. Basically what Randomizer and Lilith are saying here is to remove anyone who makes a publicly known mistake. That is foolish. Because people are imperfect, they WILL make mistakes. No matter how genius you think you are, you too will make them. This is just a more publicized one. Additionally, if you removed those people who made the publicized mistakes, you would be left with a crevasse filled in with spineless, cowardly, let's-play-it-safe-so-we-don't-get-fired people who would stagnate the sciences they were in. Critical analysis is a key way to achieve greater understanding. That's where the phrase "learning from one's mistakes comes from". If everybody just shied away because they were too afraid to be wrong, we'd never get anywhere. Almost all of the greatest minds of history were eventually proven "wrong". Take Newton and Aristotle for example. Are they laughed at because they didn't grasp quantum physics and general relativity? Because their systems of reasoning were eventually shown to be flawed? No. Instead, they were building blocks for the next generations of thinkers to analyze and correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Alorael at Large Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Randomizer Originally Posted By: Dantius First they came for the Austrian economists, and people were like "Okay, cool."? cleasing the gene pool Not okay. —Alorael, who is much more okay with there being no economists and psychologists than he is with there being no ex-economists and ex-psychologists. And hey, even chemistry had to have its alchemists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Student of Trinity Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 The first thing we do, let's disbar all the lawyers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 We're just getting rid of the junk scientists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Quote: Additionally, if you removed those people who made the publicized mistakes, you would be left with a crevasse filled in with spineless, cowardly, let's-play-it-safe-so-we-don't-get-fired people who would stagnate the sciences they were in. In fact, the history of Christian eschatology since the Millerites bears out what you say here. It's not that people have stopped believing in the second coming, the tribulation, all of that. Tens of millions do in the US alone. The main change is that the great majority of leaders in apocalyptic-focused Christian groups have become canny enough to not make falsifiable claims. Harold Camping is one of the few major exceptions in recent years (Edgar Whisenant is another), but the big names always avoid this. People like Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye are no less wrong than William Miller, their biblical hermeneutics are scarcely less messy and bizarre, but they've gotten very good at avoiding being called on it. Well, avoiding being called on it by anyone they can't dismiss as a godless liberal or a wolf in sheep's clothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Originally Posted By: Venom Oh, how pathetically short-sighted. Basically what Randomizer and Lilith are saying here is to remove anyone who makes a publicly known mistake. That is foolish. Because people are imperfect, they WILL make mistakes. No matter how genius you think you are, you too will make them. This is just a more publicized one. Additionally, if you removed those people who made the publicized mistakes, you would be left with a crevasse filled in with spineless, cowardly, let's-play-it-safe-so-we-don't-get-fired people who would stagnate the sciences they were in. Critical analysis is a key way to achieve greater understanding. That's where the phrase "learning from one's mistakes comes from". If everybody just shied away because they were too afraid to be wrong, we'd never get anywhere. Almost all of the greatest minds of history were eventually proven "wrong". Take Newton and Aristotle for example. Are they laughed at because they didn't grasp quantum physics and general relativity? Because their systems of reasoning were eventually shown to be flawed? No. Instead, they were building blocks for the next generations of thinkers to analyze and correct. look who doesn't get jokes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Dintiradan Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 @*****Cola: There's also the "like a thief in the night" camp, which I would hope would be the largest one. What am I going to trust? The section of the Bible that explicitly deals with the end times, or fragments derived from Equidistant Letter Sequence methods? This reminds me of one intro psych class I had. We were talking about the possibility of subliminal messages, and we were looking at one ad for an alcoholic drink. If you squinted at the ice cubes, you could see the letters S-E-X on them. Was this intentional? Was the company trying to subconsciously link their product to sex? Not bloody likely, said my prof, since they were perfectly capable of explicitly linking their product to sex. Or what about when Judas Priest was put on trial, because they were linked to a couple of kids trying to commit suicide? Was it because the song they were listening to contained the lyrics "My mind is dead", or "Tell her the world's not much living for", or "Guess I'll learn to fight and kill / They'll find my blood upon her windowsill"? Nooo. It's because when you play the song backwards, you can sorta almost kinda hear the words "Do it". People just love the idea of secret knowledge that only a privileged few can know. It makes for great fiction. But it doesn't really belong in a religion that explicitly states that "no one knows the day or hour". But there's another possibility. What if God's a fan of cryptograms? What if the entire cosmos is a test, and the only people who are allowed in heaven are those who are willing to spend the time and effort in finding the correct ELS that will grant them entry into life eternal? I wouldn't make it into such a heaven, which is probably for the best. It would only consist of word puzzles anyway. EDIT: Billboard win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Mea Tulpa Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 HERMENEUTICS FTWZQ123FTW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast The Mystic Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Originally Posted By: Dintiradan People just love the idea of secret knowledge that only a privileged few can know. It makes for great fiction. But it doesn't really belong in a religion that explicitly states that "no one knows the day or hour". Unfortunately, that doesn't stop people from trying. There will always be someone who insist on finding a hidden message, even when you give them ample proof that no such thing exists. Quote: But there's another possibility. What if God's a fan of cryptograms? Considering the way people try to interpret the Bible, I'd say He's more a fan of anagrams, obscure number puzzles, and funky date math. Quote: EDIT: Epic Billboard win. FYT Come to think of it, that's probably the only true end-of-the-world prophecy to come from the Bible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Ceiling Durkheim Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Yeah, the None May Know The Day Or The Hour camp has more biblical support than the others. That certainly hasn't stopped people through history from predicting dates, though. I especially like the "we can't know the day or the hour, but the bible doesn't say anything about the month or the year" loophole. It bears noting that dispensationalism and similar apocalyptic beliefs already appeal to the Bible As Cryptogram school of thought. For all of its "all there in the book of Revelation" front, dispensationalism actually draws extensively but selectively on passages from the gospels, 2 Thessalonians, Daniel, Ezekiel, and several other books. Dispenational narrative is not something that people can figure out just from reading the Bible cover to cover, in its usual order. It's already a cryptic interpretation limited to a privileged few, so increases in the degree of hermetic and esoteric interpretation like Miller's and Camping's don't seem too surprising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Rowen Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 If we are getting rid of people my vote goes for getting rid of country and rap singers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Understated Ur-Drakon Sudanna Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 I pick people that like Pokemon. Screw them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Sullust Posted May 24, 2011 Author Share Posted May 24, 2011 Originally Posted By: Lier Beneath the Silent Skies I pick people that like Pokemon. Screw them. They are actually quite good games. At any rate, if people were being 'saved' I doubt that it would be people you don't like. Well unless you're he-who-must-not-be-named... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ineffable Wingbolt Arch-Mage Solberg Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 I believe in the premillenial reign of Christ, his sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus' imminent return (Rapture), Jesus' Virgin Birth and many other fundamentals of the Christian faith. I don't know all of the answers to why or how things in the Bible happen the way they happen. There are some out there who have way more knowledge about this than me. I know that some of you scoff at us Christians for being 'close-minded' or 'believing in fairytales'. You scoff at us when we say that we have faith in what we believe in. What do you believe in? Do you believe that the entire universe (of its own accord) blasted into existence by the Big Bang? Do you believe that we are living in a multiverse instead of a universe. No matter how you think the universe came to be, you have to take it on faith. Specifically, let's talk about the Rapture. We get the word Rapture from the latin word raptus. Why Latin? From the Latin version of the Bible, the Vulgate mostly written by St. Jerome around 400 AD. This version was very popular and widely used during its first millenia. The word is found in First Thessalonians 4:17. In the King James version we see the words 'caught up'. The Rapture is people being caught (lifted) up from the ground and rising into the air where we will meet Jesus. We don't have to do anything, we will rise at His presence. About the timing of the Rapture, no one knows. It has been mentioned several times in this forum about the timing or our lack of knowing the timing so I won't go into that one. I'm sorry if I talked too much. There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Rapture and I want to help clarify if I'm able. Somehow I believe I'll catch some flack for this. Post #512 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.