Jump to content

Questionably Legal

Member
  • Posts

    199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Questionably Legal

  1. There is no bigger aphrodisiac for a female civilian than a man in a uniform, except a 6 foot dude with a six pack, or a billionaire.

     

    So according to you, all women will fall head over heels for a 6' military officer with money, but an ugly face, a-hole demeanor, and bad haircut, while ignoring a handsome, charming, and witty guy in nice non-military clothing?

  2. snapback.pngLilith, on 25 March 2014 - 05:22 AM, said:

     

    it's kind of funny that you see this as a controversial statement.

     

    ____________________________________________________|

    Not really, since it's flat out wrong.

     

    What do you base that on? The fact that you've never met anyone in such a way? It seems like you're entire argument is that you are an Army dude who is all awesome and chick-magnety, so all women must be attracted to someone based on only:

    1. Their bulging muscles.

    2. Their suave military duds.

    3. Their massive income (this explains why non-military guys can also have success dating).

     

    And mutual interests, personality, and everything else have nothing to do with it.

     

    That... is simply not true.

  3. I was going to post much the same reply. But then I remembered that I'd be replying to a skribbane addict with a sniper rifle and I thought better of it.

    I fearlessly speak the truth! While hiding indoors, in the woods, in Alaska.

     

     

     

    With the curtains closed.

  4. —Alorael, who isn't sure not having a girlfriend is really dodging a bullet. Nice for you if you don't want one, but plenty of people do. And unlike bullets, girlfriends are pretty easy to not have. Why, well over half of all humans have no girlfriends or wives!

    By that measure, bullets are also pretty easy to not have. And unlike bullets, girlfriends can follow you anywhere. :ph34r:

  5. It's the freedom do do anything you want, with no real consequences. Games designed to support evil characters will actively reward evil, and in other games there is an illicit thrill in breaking the rules. Really, how many people would be paragons of virtue in real life if given absolute power? Not me.

  6. I've played through the second Avernum trilogy, but the game engine on the first three was to much of a slog for me. As a result, I'm eagerly anticipating the A2 and A3 remakes.

  7. Ahh... Asking about relationship issues on the internet. A great way to collect many gigabytes of bad advice. But really, keep your distance unless she and boyfriend guy break up.

     

     

     

    Alternatively, hire an asassin to remove him from the picture, sleazily take advantage of resulting emotional vulnerability, have evil inner monologue about wonderful plot, score.

  8. In the end you save the world, by killing one goblin — because you have struggled so far, to reach the goblin at the end.

    The big question would be, "Why is the goblin a threat to the world at all?" If it was wielding a world-destroying weapon, that would sort of defeat the point.

  9. By "bad writer", do yoou mean that you have poor grammar, spelling and technical skills, or do you mean you are bad at thinking up an interesting plot and characters? The first can be surmounted by getting some proofreaders and/or a co-writer to help out, but the second... well... not so much.

     

     

     

    First off, where are you from?

    How is that relevant?

     

    EDIT: <_<

×
×
  • Create New...