Jump to content

Edgwyn

Member
  • Posts

    993
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Edgwyn

  1. I figure a square of trees or rocks is just a particularly dense forest or rock out cropping.  The river width is certainly a lot more problematic.  Having a river that wide but is deep enough for fish and boats is a lot of water.

  2. The trick to adaptions is having the right balance of respecting the source while making a tv show/movie that is interesting to more than just the fans of the books/games.  Having a very large budget helps.  LOTR did a pretty goo job of balancing where to follow the books and where to diverge (so I was annoyed with the divergence, but not enough to hate it) while making the story accessible to the non-fans and of course it had a large budget.  The animated version of LOTR from the 70s didn't do so well.

  3. I think that Jeff tended to attribute changes to the maps and distances between versions as being caused by "cave quakes".  I would think that the Vahnatai lands are much bigger than we see.  There are seven 48x48 squares in the Vahnatai Lands, but the four 48x48 dark water squares also seem to be part of the Vahnatai Lands also and then potentially part of the Exile caves as well, plus what ever is off stage.

  4. My impression would be that it is a bit smaller than that.  

     

    With that said, consistency is not something that seems to worry Jeff too much.  At least one of the signs in A:EFTP is Cotra in 3 miles, which is 18 squares, so a square is 1/6 of a mile.  There is a sign by Silvar that has Mertis as 15 miles away, which is 45 squares, so a square is 1/3 of a mile.  The road between Silver and Mertis has a sign that says that the Castle is 230 miles west and 40 miles south of that point.  In squares, in a straight line it is approximately 144 squares west and 20 squares to the South, making each square at least a full mile in its east-west dimension and around 2 miles in a North-South dimension (not too square).  And of course the interface changes made in A4-6 really throw things off.

     

    I would think that it would be closer to the size of England than of the UK, simply because there is not much camping outside.  While merchants wander outside of towns, they seem to make it to the inns in towns instead of camping for the night along the road.  I am not sure how fast lizard transport moves at, but I think that it would be relatively low speed.  I doubt that most of the towns are more than 15-20 miles from each other.  I would have maybe 10 miles between Fort Avernum and Silver or Fort Duvno with Cotra maybe another 10 miles away.  And then Fort Dranlon being around 20 miles away.  That is figuring that about 20 miles is how far you could travel in a day.

  5. They both look really good.  I like the gem in the blade of the 2nd for basically what TriRodent said, but I prefer the blade design of the first one as the first one seems more like a realistic sword (I know this is a fantasy, but . . .), so I would say the first one with the gem added.

  6. I have the opportunity at work to shift to a 5/4-9 schedule (five nine-hour days one week, three nine-hour and one eight-hour days the second week) with a three day weekend every other week.  I have not done so yet because of reasons, but next Fall I will relook at it.  I will enjoy the three day weekend every other week, but to shift to the nine-hour work day, I will leave my start time where it is and make my end time an hour later.

  7. 20 hours ago, It's been 0 seconds since this sign was last read. said:

    That doesn't work for doctors; you can't have a doctor be off duty without another doctor going on duty, because there's no way to put people being sick on hold for a mandatory rest. Crises can't be predicted or delayed the way a transit route can.

    But you can work on better handoff procedures and develop shift procedures.  Commercial planes on domestic routes often have more than one crew operating them in a single day because of duty day limitations.  Longer international routes travel with a larger crew so that adequate rest can be maintained.  Air Traffic Control has a very strict duty day limitation as well and has a much harder handoff problem than piloting or driving do.  

     

    I wonder how accurate the patient outcomes statistics really are.  Our knowledge of how an airplane is put together is really how as the most complicated airplane is something that we have engineered and built and is far simpler than a human.  The default finding in an accident investigation in aviation tends to be pilot error unless some other cause can be clearly identified.  Even then, pilot error is often listed as a factor.  That has created a major incentive to reduce the amount of human error possible (and will lead fairly soon to self-flying planes and self-driving vehicles).  I wonder what portion of medical errors are obscured by the greater complexity and greater difficulty getting data on a human being.  Aviation accidents tend to be fairly noticeable, medical errors can be far more subtle and I would think that they would be more likely to be under reported (they are harder to determine).

  8. I find it interesting that the research shows that medical outcomes do not change based on work schedule much.  Commercial Pilots and Truck drivers have limitations on their work rest cycle/crew duty day that were supposedly established as safety measurers based on research.

  9. I have only done 24 hour shifts a few times (and 36 hour shifts twice), and I have never understood why the medical profession thinks that they are a good idea.  With that said, any night shift schedule is unpleasant to me as I always found it hard to sleep during the day on my days off when my family is up and wanting to do things.

  10. I would find it hard to sleep in for the extra hour and so would rather have the extra hour at the end of the day.  It would be a harder question for me if you made the choice between work starting an hour earlier and ending an hour earlier or work starting and hour later and ending an hour later.

  11. If you click on the portrait of one of your characters it becomes the active character.  When you are in a character's inventory, you can click on an item, move the mouse to over another character's portrait and then click and the item will transfer inventories.  For ease of play, weight only counts for items that are equipped.  

  12. I do not identify as Cis (as in it is extremely unlikely that you will hear/read me apply that label to myself), but, it is accurate as a label for me and so I selected it for the purposes of the poll, just like Sylae choose a term that she doesn't particularly like.  Being fortunate enough to be in the position that I am in, the label is 100% accurate and has no emotional context to me, it is just not a term that I use outside of answering demographic information.

     

    I do believe that if you are going to answer a friendly poll that you should provide as accurate information as possible.  While this poll is unlikely to effect anything, poll, surveys and samples have huge impacts on the goods and services that we are offered and the more garbage fed into them, the more inaccurate they are and the poorer the decisions that will be made from them.

  13. 1 hour ago, Lilith said:

     

    answer: it's actually pretty important for a government to have some formal definition of who counts as a member of your family for purposes like inheritance, immigration, and medical decision-making, and marriage is socially recognized as a way for two people to become part of the same family. the consequences of being legally recognized as family members add up to a big enough deal in everyday life that before same-sex marriage, there were a number of same-sex relationships where one partner resorted to adopting the other as their child because that was the only way for them to have a legally recognized family relationship. in some countries where same-sex marriage still isn't recognized, this still happens

     

    imo the "why does the government recognize marriage" position is one of those things that sounds good until you dig deeper into the practical implications of it

    I agree that it is important, and I think that a review would have found it important and would have better articulated why the right of marriage should be extended. It hopefully would also have resulted in a national standard (in the US, there are differences at the state level) as to what age one has to be in order to be married.  The other part of the question though is why is two the magic number for a secular legal contract?  The question of what is the maximum number of people who could be married to each other would need to be part of any realistic study of the secular benefits of marriage.

×
×
  • Create New...