Hatchling Cockatrice Slariton Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 The original topic was eaten by the message board software, and the replacement topic appears to have fallen prey to a similar bug. Here's a second try at a replacement topic for the "Regulation" debate. N.B.: Cat pictures will be edited out mercilessly. If you break the thread, justice will be delivered Shaper style, preferably with a Discipline Wand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Understated Ur-Drakon Nioca Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Just so you know, the first replacement topic is still around . And it's also breaking the Today's Active Topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Slariton Posted May 10, 2007 Author Share Posted May 10, 2007 The first replacement topic can't be replied to, Nioca. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Are you sure this isn't a sign that God doesn't want us continuing this discussion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 No, it's just an intelligent seal acting for its own reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ineffable Wingbolt Stillness Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 No the Devil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Dikiyoba Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Perhaps topics composed mostly of long posts should be locked when they hit page 20, since this thread-wrecking bug seems to happen fairly consistently? Dikiyoba. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Kelandon Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 I don't quite remember where we were in that other thread. As I recall, my last post involved the fact that irreducible complexity makes a statement about what cannot ever happen and therefore must justify that this cannot ever happen under any circumstances. Stillness seemed appalled and wanted to back into probabilities again, but irreducible complexity doesn't rely on probabilities. It relies on impossibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.