Jump to content

Cairo Jim

Member
  • Posts

    1,340
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cairo Jim

  1. On the other hand, spending ridiculous amounts of money and time just to bring that one asteroid might not necessarily drop the price of gold and platinum straight away. One factor of the cost of producing anything is how long and how much it cost to produce and or acquire the resources.

  2. you couldn't achieve more easily by building orbital space colonies and mining asteroids

     

    The moon and Mars' higher gravity would make construction and livability a lot easier, as well as Mars being a lot closer to more asteroids for mining.

  3. The obvious problem with a space elevator (besides building the thing) is how to keep it from collapsing.

     

     

    How tall would be built? There isn't anything can really you attach it to.

     

     

    Yes, it would be faster if rockets constantly burned fuel instead of coasting much of the way, but propulsion isn't really the problem. Fuel is. If you want to burn a ton of fuel, you have to send up a spacecraft with a ton of fuel. All that fuel is heavy and you have to add more fuel and bigger rockets to get out of Earth's gravity well. Except now you've added even more weight, which means more fuel.

     

    Jetting around space is easy if you're patient. It's getting to space with enough gas to do anything that's hard.

     

     

    Fuel is part of any form of propulsion or locomotion, or any sort of motion. Improving the propulsion would not only help go a wee bit faster, but also fuel efficiency would come into it somewhere. Less fuel needed plus faster engines, anyone?

     

    Patience with jetting around space is fine if you think you can live for 2 or 300 years.

  4. It would be nice if they cane develop a decent propulsion system while they're at it. It seems and awful amount of fuel is used just to get out of atmosphere, and once in space it takes months, sometimes years just to get seemingly small distances.

  5. I would like to take part in another AIMHack, since the only one I was involved in was sadly cut short. Although lately, I haven't had the time since my newest job involves 12-15 hour days, including a tiny bit of travel time.

  6. This is true, but in order for it to be logically relevant, you need to point out an important difference. You have not.

     

     

    The point was that the gun control measures in Australia gave a real sense of security, not a false one. And real security, while we're at it, which is more important: gun crime in fact plummeted.

     

    This I can agree with partially. It is extremely difficult to get a gun in the first place due to licencing laws in Australia, and they are never sought after as something stupid as "self defence".

     

     

    Australia isn't America. Personally, I admire the United States for valuing freedom over a false sense of security. If people in the U.S.A don't like guns, then don't buy them. If they don't like living around people with guns, move to a gun free area. Expecting people to give up a freedom enshrined in their Constitution simply to make you feel a little bit safer is the high of tyranny. Demanding otherwise law-abiding citizens to hand in their firearms when government enforcers are armed to the teeth stinks of hypocrisy.

     

    It's that million year old right to own a gun that is getting people armed to the teeth and scared silly in the first place. It's that ridiculous that if someone has a rock thrown at them while sitting on their front balcony, that just "have the need" to own and AK-47 for "self defence", and all because they have the right to. Its the same mentality that people can just walk into K-Mart, buy all their ammo and then go rampaging.

     

     

    brocktree please stay out of politics threads and stick to posting useful and interesting things about games

     

    Whatever you do, stop winging over nothing.

  7.  

     

    —Alorael, who can understand wanting to hunt. It's a right worth preserving. He can understand wanting to be able to defend oneself.

     

    I can understand the hunting thing. There's a few guys I work with that do it when they can. Although they do own a couple rifles, they are still dumbfounded at how anyone could bear themselves in the U.S to walk into a school armed to the teeth. As for self defence, you don't need a weapon. I did Taekwon Do for about 3 years, and since there were always kids attending the classes, we were always told that running away is your best defence.

×
×
  • Create New...