Jump to content

Harehunter

Member
  • Posts

    1,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Harehunter

  1. In my English lit class, we had to read several passages from Chauser. I found it fascinating just how the English language had changed from Middle English to modern English. Even more interesting is that there are many words from the Middle English still in current usage in Scottish dialect. I had the opportunity to talk with someone from Glasgow, and when he mentioned the climate as 'dreich', I actually understood him.

    I guess I was lucky in that my teacher had actually made several trips to England and Scotland and had studied the language quite thoroughly. Did you know that at one time all the letters in the word knight were actually pronounced?

  2. Originally Posted By: Suddenly, you encounter
    Usually it's acetone.

    —Alorael, who was surprised by just how denatured denatured alcohol is. It can be around 10% denaturant.

    I guess it is just de-nature of de business.
  3. You are right on the money, Trenton. However, the dialog makes the topic of dragon mating habits even more confusing. An excerpt of the dialog with him:

    Quote:

    You finally stand before the dragon Athron. He towers above you, three times your height, and looks down upon you with distrust and grim distaste. When he exhales, little flames comes out.

    He growls. "I am Athron the dragon. This you knew. Quit wasting my time."

     

    Quote:
    For a brief moment, his expression turns from anger to pride. "I am looking after my brood." The anger returns. "And I deal with disturbances."

    "For the first time in five centuries, new dragonlings are about to hatch."

  4. Originally Posted By: Alorael
    It doesn't taste like much of anything, and the less it has a taste the better it is! I find this mystifying. I could make something like it myself (for free, if I pilfered lab ethanol stocks a bit), and it would still be unpalatable as a beverage on its own. Vodka in a cocktail, sure.

    We had a problem with ethanol pilfering at my university. The staff solved the problem by denaturing it with phenolphthalein.
  5. Originally Posted By: Master1
    Sorry if I'm bringing up a dead horse (although a day is hardly dead), but I think there was a case of mistaken definition.
    ...
    I certainly understand what you're saying, Harehunter. Those who believe others are inferior and deserving of harm because they hold difference beliefs are certainly unreasonable. If the Pope* decided that all non-Catholics were evil and should be killed, he would certainly lose support. If he acted on that belief, I would not hesitate to have him arrested.

    The issue that I see is your use of the term fundamentalism. While you may not realize it, some people will see what you write without looking for context or your definition. The reason that we have standard definitions is to maintain clear communication. You can't expect us to use your definition.

    *Just using a non-Islamic figure for example. I mean no disrespect to anyone or any religion.


    I stand corrected. I was using the word improperly by its definition. I am still grasping for the correct word to convey my meaning. And your use of the Inquisition does not offend me. In fact, that is another perfect example of a theocracy run amok. Another reason to prohibit the establishment of a state church.
  6. Originally Posted By: Randomizer
    Everything will be computerized, but the computers to access the information will no longer exist. Wait that's already happening and my program on a paper tape.

    Oh my aching eyeballs. I'll bet you can still read that tape without the machine, too.
  7. Originally Posted By: Slouching Towards Blosk
    Windows also still hasn't caught up to Mac OS. There are good arguments for using Windows—price of hardware, arguably, and definitely availability of software—but quality of OS is generally not conceded to be one of them. There's a substantial case to be made for Windows being the result of a near-monopoly wrecking the free market. The IBM compatible hardware, on the other hand, has improved, but having non-compatible hardware would have driven competition just fine.

    Yes, I've just started another platform war.

    I always thought that the stability of the MAC OS was due to the closed architecture of the system. By keeping the core hardware proprietary, Apple had a finite set of components to write its OS to. The IBM model invited the invention of various, competing hardware, over which it had no control, thus resulting in an anarchic melange of semi compatible hardware and software. Even as stable as the current MS OS's and applications, in my final analysis, Windows is a pane in the glass.
  8. Originally Posted By: HOUSE of S
    It doesn't really do that, though. English grammar hasn't changed significantly in a long time, and owes bits to relatives of Old French and nothing, really, to Latin or Greek, let alone Spanish or any other languages that English acquires words from. But the word-acquiring works in all directions, all languages do that, and indeed English probably provides other languages with vastly more loan-words than it receives.

    English grammar has not been affected Latin or Greek, but its vocabulary has. Just take a quick tour of the medical dictionary, which is heavily populated by words manufactured from Greek root words. Other technologies manufacture words from Latin roots. BTW, the melding of adjectives to nouns to form new nouns is a characteristic of German, which loves to do that. As for words like rodeo, lariat, poncho, they are taken directly from Spanish.

    The Norman French influence is evident from the perspective of food. To the Saxons who raised the livestock, it was called pig or cow. To the Normans, it was referred as pork or beouf, pork coming from Latin root word porcus into the French language, and beouf which came from Old French. Note that the transliteration of beouf to beef demonstrates my earlier point about the inconsistency of keeping the pronunciation and changing the spelling.
  9. Originally Posted By: Slouching Towards Blosk
    I'm pretty sure WOPR is IBM compatible.

    "The only winning solution is not to play.
    How about a nice game of chess?"

    Originally Posted By: Slouching Towards Blosk

    —Alorael, who doubts it would run another OS. Linux is suspiciously foreign and possibly communist. Unix might be okay, but now it's now worryingly linked to Apple, whose aesthetic doesn't invoke the kind of chunky, can-do Americanism that a war machine should have. And Windows has the story of rags-to-riches capitalism that America needs behind it!

    On the database server side, I prefer Unix. It allows me to set up different environments for each user, as opposed to all users sharing a common registry. But on the desktop I am a strongly adherent to Windows. The open architecture of first IBM PC did open the doors wide open for entrepreneurs to build additional hardware and software to rapidly improve its functionality. The resulting machines of today are the result of capitalist competition.

    Interesting perspective on Linux though. I'll have to percolate that through my neural net to know how to respond. I am ambivalent because it is open architecture, like the first PCs, and its resemblance to my DB servers is comfortable. But then you point out that it is communist. Well, it is the result of a community effort, so I guess the word applies.
×
×
  • Create New...