Jump to content

Harehunter

Member
  • Posts

    1,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Harehunter

  1. Originally Posted By: Tyranicus
    I think what we can take home from this topic is that very few people type the same way as others, but everyone assumes everyone types the way they do. tongue

    That is because in some ways we are all different types of people.

    vive le diversity!
  2. Originally Posted By: Mistb0rn
    Left shift.
    But I don't type right at all; though I did try to learn the right way at one point, I quickly got tired of the exercises and resigned myself to ~40 words per minute my hideous monstrosity of a method allows.


    I took typing in high school, at my mother's urging, and I got up to 47 wpm on a manual typewriter. That sucker required a hefty hand to move the keys. When I started working on terminals and PCs, I got up to about 80+ wpm in spurts. Flying Fingers Finnigan strikes again. When the Parkinson's hit me, I dropped to about 10 wpm because I had to use my right hand exclusively. With the new meds working pretty good, I'm back up to about 50-60wpm.
  3. Sorry about all that. I've been having pun elsewhere. I need inspiration to pull off a stream like this one.

     

    Talking about old computers and data storage on the Pictures thread.

     

    And to think that a mere 30+ years ago, people used punched cards for storage. By the way, has anyone seen Chad hanging around lately? The last time I saw him, he was pretty tensed out. He needs to learn to let the chips fall where they may. I seem to have misplaced my bit bucket, as well. I need it so I can repair these cards with holes in them. With out them, I'm going to feel all out of sorts. I guess I'd better wrap this up before some tries to deck me.

     

    Originally Posted By: Harehunter
    Originally Posted By: Necris Omega
    ... I imagine Harehunter blowing a vacuum tube stringing that nightmare of antiquated storage puns together.

    Canines abhor a vacuum. And, no I didn't blow a tube, but I did blow off some steam. Look out Stanley, I'm chugging through.

     

    Originally Posted By: Excalibur
    Originally Posted By: Harehunter
    By the way, has anyone seen Chad hanging around lately?

    Just ask Al Gore.

    Now I have used a few AlGorithms in my career as a programmer. They come in pretty handy for solving some problems. Has anyone seen my slide ruler?

     

    Later we got onto the subject of

    shift key usage

     

     

    The presumptive purveyor of puns must pace his patter to preserve the potency of his putrid product.

     

    (What's a little alliteration among friends?)

  4. Originally Posted By: Goldenqueen
    Backing up is for chickens. If my disk failed right now I would cease to exist.
    Paranoia is a healthy attribute for Database Administrators. I have backups of my backups, and backups of those backups at an offsite location. I do the same thing with my personal machine at home, except I don't have an offsite location. I wonder if I shouldn't check out Carbonite?
  5. Originally Posted By: Soul of Wit
    Originally Posted By: In memory of the forgetful
    Well, what should his achievements have been? Apple is too broad. Apple computers and Mac OS are great for those who love him, but they've never had the huge traction that the things have.

    The man revolutionized the personal computer with the Apple II and, again, with the Macintosh. Anyone using a computer today knows this--or should.

    At the time Steve invented the Apple II computer, Personal Computers looked like this 664px-Altair_8800_Computer.jpg .
  6. Originally Posted By: Excalibur
    Believe it or not that actually startled me.

    I kind of wonder if I'm the only one who exclusively uses the left shift key. I don't think I even touch the right shift key.
    Actually, I thought I was weird for doing the same thing. It is good to know that I am in good company.

    You know you're an Oracle programmer if you can touch-type the Caps-Lock key.
  7. Originally Posted By: Necris Omega
    ... I imagine Harehunter blowing a vacuum tube stringing that nightmare of antiquated storage puns together.

    Canines abhor a vacuum. And, no I didn't blow a tube, but I did blow off some steam. Look out Stanley, I'm chugging through.

    Originally Posted By: Excalibur
    Originally Posted By: Harehunter
    By the way, has anyone seen Chad hanging around lately?

    Just ask Al Gore.
    Now I have used a few AlGorithms in my career as a programmer. They come in pretty handy for solving some problems. Has anyone seen my slide ruler?
  8. Originally Posted By: Lilith
    Originally Posted By: Harehunter
    Actually, its sort of like postal chess.


    is that like regular chess except when you lose you shoot your opponent
    Once upon a time, a half a lifetime ago, before the invention of the internet (my god I feel ancient) people used to sit down and write with their hand (hence the origin of the term 'handwriting') a brief correspondence with their friends and family. Long-distant calling was available, but it was too Price-y (I was wondering where Vincent came from). It was also common to foot-note their letters with their next chess move. (Seque Avernum 3, the two huts on either side of the ogre infested pass.)
  9. And to think that a mere 30+ years ago, people used punched cards for storage. By the way, has anyone seen Chad hanging around lately? The last time I saw him, he was pretty tensed out. He needs to learn to let the chips fall where they may. I seem to have misplaced my bit bucket, as well. I need it so I can repair these cards with holes in them. With out them, I'm going to feel all out of sorts. I guess I'd better wrap this up before some tries to deck me.

  10. Originally Posted By: Polaran
    Originally Posted By: The Turtle Stays
    There needs to be a SW group video chat at some point. Just because y'all arguing in real time would be remarkable.


    It'd probably suck, mostly. Real-time debate would offer far less time to coherently organize ones points, and would demand a far different sort of conversational aptitude than we're using here.
    Actually, its sort of like postal chess. It gives us time to digest each others arguments, research your facts ( spewing false information on this forum of well educated people will draw 100 verbal lashes), and compose a thoughtful and respectfully worded response. If you like reality show arguments, there are plenty of those. (BTW, whatever happened to Jerry Springer?)

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Yosimite Sam and Sylvester Cat are in cahoots against Bugs Bunny and Tweety Bird...
    (What is a 'cahoot' anyway? Some strange cross breed of a cat and an owl?)
    Click to reveal..
    owlcat.jpg
  11. Interestingly, land navigation is one of the skills they taught me in the army. I developed the knack of 'seeing' a two-dimensional topographic map in 'three' dimensions. In fact I had the highest score in my training company. Of course, I was a lot younger and a lot more fit back then. ;-)

    If fact, I even had hair on top of my now bald pate! :-D

    But you know what they say...

    Click to reveal..
    Hare today, gone tomorrow.
  12. Originally Posted By: In memory of the forgetful
    Actually, no, here it's not okay to right censored profanity either.

    —Alorael, who doesn't see it entirely as hypocrisy. Some of it is about wanting to promote civility. Granted, that's not the motive here, but it could be!
    When I was a soldier, I cussed as a soldier. When I became a civilian, I had to become more civilian. civility... civil!
    It may seem silly, or hypocritical to some, to use profanity in private, and refrain from it where minors are concerned, especially since the theatres are full of movies that are full of violence and profanity. But it certainly doesn't hurt us to try to be more polite to each other.

    Back on topic... I have had a little experience with First Person Shooter games, and have found them to be repetitive and boring. DOOM, Hexen, Heretic. Once through and I was done. Exile, Avernum, Myst. They get replayed so much I've worn the shiny off the bits. I've even put together a few maps for other players to enjoy. Give me more story, more thoughtful encounters. These, I relish.
  13. Originally Posted By: Lilith
    you know you'd probably find this forum a less abrasive environment if you didn't get defensive every time someone made a joke that wasn't even directed specifically at you

    I suppose I need to brush up on my sense of what is meant as a joke. Political Correctness here in the states has run amok and is getting people fired from their jobs. Maybe you can assist me in recognizing what you intend as a joke.
  14. Originally Posted By: Lilith
    also what does any of this have to do with posting pictures of ourselves


    Originally Posted By: Lilith
    while the whole rider system is pretty awful it's basically a symptom of other even more broken things like the rules for dealing with a filibuster that make it unreasonably difficult to get any bill passed in the first place. if a bill looks like it's going to pass then naturally people tack on as many legislative barnacles to it as they can
    I don't know. What say we drop this topic and move back to the original subject. If any one wishes to continue further in this vein, we can start another thread.

    Pax?
  15. Originally Posted By: Dantius
    Originally Posted By: Harehunter
    Actually, speaking strictly as a veteran, I do agree that once our military personnel have been deployed, they should be supplied with whatever resources they need to survive. I don't agree with the notion that all our current deployments were justified or necessary. I do believe that it is past time to end such deployments, which would in fact reduce the need for military funding.


    Oh absolutely. The problem is, a very good deal of "military" spending isn't actually being spent on insuring this. For instance, apparently it's more important to update our fleet of strategic bombers in order to fight the Cold War 20 years after it ended than to actually equip soldiers with effective body armor or armor for Humvees. Or that, combat aside, that it's somehow acceptable to take hundreds of billions of dollars of federal tax dollars ever year, but still pay some military servicemen wages low enough that they would qualify for food stamps if they had families.

    The amount of sheer waste and ineffective use of resources in the DoD is simply mind-boggling- I'm sure that literally tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds, could be cut with absolutely no noticeable impact on US military performance or troop welfare, and if resources could be actually reallocated to places where they were needed instead of being wasted on the pet concerns of Pentagon officials, you would probably see huge improvements in troop effectiveness.
    If you're looking for an argument from me, you won't find one. Too many DOD projects are un-needed and un-wanted. And the process by which government contracts are handed out is a political boondoggle. Add to that the tremendous additional waste of money charged to the government by those contractors, money they are are required to spend in order to meet regulations. And I am not going to argue that there is not a lot of fraudulent billing done by those corporations, fraud that was supposed to be prevented by those expensive regulations.

    The only benefit is that it is one of few things the federal government can do that directly produces jobs. You may freely debate over the worth of these jobs, but there they are.
  16. Originally Posted By: In memory of the forgetful
    To the best of my understanding, Tea Partiers, while a varied group, tend to be against all taxation. It's also been shown that people genuinely aren't aware of many things that the government, particularly the federal government, underwrites. "Hands off my Medicaid!" isn't a joke; it's not actually obvious where the money comes from for many popular programs.

    Actually, not quite right by my understanding. They do know that taxes are a necessary thing for the government to have the resources to provide what the government should provide. One key part of the debate is about how much government we should have at the federal level, and how much should be left at the state and local level. Another key part is, when it is said that the 'rich' people need to be taxed more, just who are those 'rich' people. If a person earns more than $250,000, are they 'rich'? And how does taxing corporations more increase job opportunities? What does 're-distribution of wealth' mean? Does the federal government have the right to force individual citizens to purchase anything? And why did we put over half a billion dollars in a company which had already been determined that it would fail? I know the government funds a lot of 'basic' research which produces no immediate product, but without it no future breakthroughs can be achieved. I know that government subsidies are important to prop up industries that are vital, or at least of significant economic importance. But to throw such money into a hole that has no chance of producing any long term employment, that's a crying shame.

    Originally Posted By: In memory of the forgetful

    —Alorael, who understands the cut taxes not defense, sort of. Defense has become a kind of untouchable entitlement because the right is axiomatically opposed to reduced spending and the Democrats are too afraid of losing centrist voters to do anything. Cutting taxes is supposed to increase revenue to pay for defense, somehow. It's a self-consistent economic view; it's just not borne out by actual economic observations.

    Actually, speaking strictly as a veteran, I do agree that once our military personnel have been deployed, they should be supplied with whatever resources they need to survive. I don't agree with the notion that all our current deployments were justified or necessary. I do believe that it is past time to end such deployments, which would in fact reduce the need for military funding.
×
×
  • Create New...