Originally Posted By: Dantius
Technology, I doubt, simply because of the fact that the US military spends about a kajillion dollars on R&D in order to stop countries from surpassing us in technology, or at least in technology that could prove to be a threat to our security. Plus, it's easy to score high on the HDI when you're a tiny country with a very homogeneous and xenophobic population, like many high-scoring European countries are (Switzerland, for example). While the US may be somewhat xenophobic, we're certainly neither small nor homogeneous, so we tend to have problems ensuring that our citizens have thigh highest standard of living possible, because the government has decided that some things are more important than that, like security and infrastructure and so forth.
Good point, though according to definition a country's HDI is measured by life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living compared to countries worldwide. A country's size doesn't affect these things too much, perhaps resource wise though.
Japan has technology that we won't hope to see for years here in America, yet they're small. But also, Cambodia is small too and fairly under developed.
Perhaps if we didn't spend a crapload of money sticking our nose into other country's buisness, we'd have a higher standard of living. I know that sounded harsh, but we have homeless and starving people right here, I don't think we can afford to spend money on other countries right now. The US actually gives away extra food to other countries (not saying this is a bad thing, just inefficient) when we have to subsidize our farmers.
Just a thought!