Jump to content

teh banana

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


Everything posted by teh banana

  1. On sedond thought, nothing. Let the man keep his dreams. ^^
  2. I wouldn't actually consider myself a newbie, dear member #5181.. Oh, unless you actually are a secondary account of a member who's been here longer than me (= your member number is less than 1098, and you're not a WELL known and member (ie. Kel, Aran, Stugie, etc.). Also, flaming The Misterhood is quite bad an idea. Things like that tend to cause massive flame wars, in which both sides get shot to pieces. Quote: The idea that you're entitled to tell people what to do is hilarious. I've ORDERED you to leave BoE forum, now? Learn to read. To SUGGEST ain't even close to ORDERING/FORCING in my dictionary. So, some cheese with the whine?
  3. Arenax fails at both mockery and thinking. Suggesting you to leave a forum DEDICATED TO A GAME YOU DISLIKE AND KEEP ON DISSING isn't whining.
  4. Creature graphic numbers, Kel. 1-1533 Ogre 2-1534 Ogre Mage 3-1550 Haakai 4-1565 Triad Member/Royal Mage 5-1566 Slith Avatar 6-1570 Demonic Creature (Av1 leftover, not used in Av2) 7-1607 Rakshasha 8-1608/1609 Naga 9-1611 Garzhad 10-1612 Empire Soldier 11-1619/1620 Mutant Giant 12-1621/1622 Efreet
  5. Quote: TGM: BoE > BoA, actually. Quote: Arenax: TGM: Keep drinkin' that koolaid. I'm not allowed to have a personal opinion? New members aren't required to COMPLETELY SCREW THEMSELVES UP here, you know. Just leave this Blades of EXILE forum, if the game, in your opinion, is sucky. Oh, in conclusion, [added the pic, yay!]
  6. I'm in favour of the option 1, too. The moment a tool like that pops out, I'll begin designing a serious BoA scenario. Seriously. ^^
  7. Actually, his age is widely known. Also, let me present you, the Code of Conduct of these boards (which you are, by the way, breaking like no member before). Please note, I have bolded the parts you're guilty of. Quote: What constitutes a minor infraction for a member: + Repeated posting of off-topic material on non-Miscellaneous forums. + Posting unauthorized copyrighted material + Using vulgarity in any language (whether it's in the open, masked, or abbreviated) + Faulty accusation of a member or moderator, including calling for the leaving or banning of a member that is innocent of infraction. + Posting two (or more) different topics about the same thing. + Double posting + Advertising or any form of commercial solicitation. + Requesting information about hex-editing. What constitutes a major transgression for a member: + Any communication that is intended to harass, belittle, humiliate, threaten or cause embarrassment to a fellow member. + Hate speech against a certain group of people, due to their religion, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, etc. + Impersonation of another person or screen name (including "faking" a screen name by using similar-looking text characters). + Discussion of illegal activities. + Depictions of sexually explicit material. + Flooding the forums with lots of topics and posts about nothing legitimate. + Requests for "cracks", pirated software, ways to pirate software, etc. So, please, JUST SHUT UP.
  8. +t screws up. The Administration hits +t (999). +t is KIKBANND. ^^
  9. Yes, Soldberg has been informed about that. Many times, in many threads. ^^
  10. got me tehre, didnt u, heh, whatre u, a ************* genuis ur sumthin lol. well anyway shere, have a cookie. or lol, two haha XD !!1! XD
  11. You, sirs, have problems. And no, that's not flaming, just a fact. ^^
  12. Dear Soldberg.. Your above post had nothing to do with the subject(s) of this topic.. Oh, and check the dates, please. This particular thread has been dead for, what, two weeks. Resurrecting dead stuff has never been approved here at SW. You've been around for long (#303), never taken a look at the CoC? So, please, DON'T SPAM, and WE'LL ALL BE HAPPY and EAT TEA AND BISCUITS AND SUCH GLRBH.
  13. Thanks for needlessly resurrecting a dead topic, and congrats!
  14. You consider porting the Avernum-trilogy to Pocket PC? What do we think about that? LOL, is what we think. Someone with better understanding of the copyright infringements (sp?) and stuff will tell you, why exactly. ^^
  15. Quote: Originally written by crossmr: Quote: Originally written by Prince Albert in a Can: Kaimorad was a fixed BoE. Jeff was not happy to hear about it. what do you mean by fixed BoE? I didn't know it was broken? http://www.geocities.com/blyceum/DForum/023.html , http://www.geocities.com/blyceum/DForum/034.html , http://www.geocities.com/blyceum/DForum/041.html .
  16. I've the graphicless version of Caer Selwyn, too. It'd be nice to see how the scenario really should play out, though.. So yay for Luz. ^^
  17. You can, but it's quite hard and.. well, illegal. ^^
  18. Quote: Originally written by Wham Bam Shizam: And also I am wondering if I should even make one because it seems BoE is dying. And with Spidweb's treatment towards BoE, possible their greatest creation, I am not too optimistic. But I do think that there will be a small community of die-hard BoE lovers that will still put out a good scenario every once in a while, no matter how much other games outshadow it, or wether its designers totally neglect it. Am I right? Or do I have some empty optimism? No way we (the community) will just vanish just because Jeff and co abandoned us. If we'd give up because of that.. hey, the community wouldn't have been here for years. There'll always be players for new BoE scenarios, no matter what Jeff himself thinks.
  • Create New...