Jump to content

Finished Spiderweb games - recommendations for similar RPGs?


Recommended Posts

Honestly CRPG's sorta died off after Dragon Age Origins etc hit the scene. Its not like you missed anything MAJOR op.


Pillars of Eternity is a great game that suffers from truly awful all around writing. The main story is just poorly delivered. Its like it wanted to be like BG1's 'lets go adventuring!' mixed with BG2's epic story. It fails in typical Obsidian fashion. The companions are hit or miss, but I personally found them far more interesting than Dragon Age's companions. Then you have the world and lore ... which... feels kind of like Forgotten Realms fan fiction. It wants to be darker and grittier... but really isn't? Combat wise, Pillars is similar to BG1 in that spells aren't the do all end all of combat. So it feels more fun for me, as BG2's wizard duels etc bored me to tears as I looked up a particular counter spell and whatnot.


If you liked Spiderweb's games, I'd HIGHLY reccomend Trese Brother's games. Star Traders: Frontiers, Heroes of Steel, Battle Templars, etc. If you just want epic tactical combat. Stories are non-existent... but hey. Fun, cheap games with some responsive developers.


Shadowrun Dragonfall, Shadowrun Hong Kong, Underrail, and Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines come to mind as indie CRPG's I liked. (Although, Vampire is more like the original Deus Ex but I feel like anyone would like it. Along with the original Deus Ex. Not that newfangled nonsense, the ORIGINAL Deus Ex... and System Shock 2... and... Ok. I'll stop.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really should play Divine Divinity. I loved that original game because it was just as addicting as Avernun, and had a real low budget sense aboit it, especially how the storyline was ridiculous. Only gripe is it broke the foirth wall too much and was less serious than the current Avernun games that tackle a real mature and serious theme of imprisonment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 11/23/2016 at 12:35 AM, SoulScroll said:

I second what grimmader said. Heroes of Steel ... good turn-based RPG's with nice storylines and deep combat strategy requiring skill synergies to make a group work well together on harder difficulties. There's also a Nightmare-level leaderboard with scoring based on game progress & resource efficiency if you feel competitive. Heroes of Steel is standard RPG setting while Templar is sci-fi RPG.


I'm near the end of Heroes of Steel right now...trying decide if I should just walk away.  The game has many problems:

  • If you want to see a game with lack of variety in enemies, Heroes of Steel is the archetype.  Boring.
  • Similarly, no variety in battles.  ~30 enemies against your four-member party.  Again and again and again.
  • No walkthroughs on the Internet.  No need given that the game consists of the same enemies and battles constantly.  However, in one area, I opened a gate, got decimated, reloaded, went to the same gate and couldn't get in this time.  I suspect it's a bug.  Went to the Internet to look for a walkthrough...none.

After a few days, when my head clears from the tedium, I'll probably return to finish off this uninspired "170% successfully funded KickStarter" game.  My guess: the people who like this game paid in...it's called "cognitive dissonance", guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I wasn't sure if this was worthwhile to start a new thread over, but I just re-played through Age of Decadence a couple times (It's only $4.99 right now on the Steam sale, at least in Ameribucks...).  Really looking forward to Queen's Wish, but needed something to scratch the itch meanwhile.  Anyway, I thought I'd offer a little compare/contrast about what I think Spiderweb does better than Iron Tower (AoD dev), and what Spiderweb could maybe learn from them - or at least where I think AoD shone.


I'll start with what I liked:


-The Stash.  I would guess the idea was borrowed from Diablo or such, but it's still a nifty feature in Age of Decadence.  You can put stuff in whatever chest throughout the game and it will remain in that chest, but there are very certain ones that are linked.  In the major towns, when you buy a room at the Inn, your room will contain a chest that's "My Stash,"  and if you put something into your stash (in your inn room) in one major town, you can access that same stuff/stash in another major town.  It's a nifty feature, and I wouldn't mind seeing that find its way to Spiderweb - let's say, the PC's house, Kriszan, Fort Emergence, Shayder, Lorelei, and Tevrono.  


-Attack aiming.  With your weapon in AoD, you can go for a regular attack, a body blow, a hit to the legs, a headshot, etc, all with different potential status effects.  I guess in Spiderweb games you can do this with skills, but I kind of like the way it works in AoD, and I wouldn't mind seeing something similar as another layer for PCs who were fighting with weapons.  You can use a spell, a technique, a skill... or just a plain old normal attack, which you can aim at the torso, or the legs, or head, or whatever.  Could be a vehicle for making the skill trees interesting.


-In AoD I kind of enjoyed some of the in-fight commentary from your opponents.  LIttle things like "Oh damn, I'm bleeding"  or "That'll show you" - and plenty of cursing, though I don't know if I'd want Spidweb to go that far.  After all I probably wouldn't have been allowed to play Exile 3 back in the day in that case.  I know that select fights in Spiderweb games have "cutscenes", but the banter in everyday fights was a nice little bit of flavor.  


-I liked that you could play the game as, essentially, a diplomat (or a smooth-talking scoundrel), and win the game with a body count of zero if you wanted.  Not practical in Avernum where you're literally fighting monsters, but it's a fun way to approach political encounters.


-I liked the story and the way that you could have major effects on the world and ending(s) with your decisions, but this is something Spiderweb games deliver in spades too.  Still, it makes the game worth a playthrough for someone who's into Spiderweb games for similar reasons.




Here's what I either didn't like, or at least think Spiderweb is clearly better at:


-The camera, oh my goodness.  AoD is an isometric game, and so are many Spiderweb games, but the camera in AoD is just horrible.  You can get lost in the bad 3D, your view gets obscured very often, there's a high "where the heck am I" factor - and to top it off, there's no minimap.  Navigating and following your character break the immersion of an otherwise mostly very good experience.


-I mentioned that I like the stash in AoD, but otherwise, Spidweb has it beat in QoL features.  The junk bag (which I suppose is essentially a mobile stash), the multipurpose hotbar, the minimap, the special item inventory, and I'm sure other items I'm not thinking about right now, these are all positives for Spiderweb, and playing a "similar" game that lacked them, made me appreciate them all the more.


-One of my playthroughs I beat the game without even hearing of the antagonist, let alone meeting them.  I also would sometimes get dialogue and decision options that referenced people I've never met, or caused me to do things my character should've had no idea about.  While I don't necessarily want the story to be railroaded (hi Avadon), I want to at least experience it some.  It just felt a little weird occasionally and I can't really elaborate because spoilers.  


-Another point where I need to tread carefully because spoilers, but - the endings.  There are a wide array of endings you can achieve in the game, but they all feel very abrupt.  When I invest a large amount of time into a story game like this, I want to really enjoy the ending.  In AoD, you get a 3 or 4 screen slideshow with a few sentences each and then the title screen.  It felt abrupt and unsatisfying.  Modern Spiderweb games are better at unfolding endings (even if I'm still sad about Avernum 3: Ruined World basically having a "you win" screen... I know it's a remaster but I would've loved a fleshed out ending sequence like the more recent Spiderweb games). 


-Speaking of Endings, I would've appreciated a heads up that I was about to enter endgame and needed to go back and tie up anything else I wanted to do, before proceeding.  Like you get in Avadon, for instance.  


-In AoD, there could be massive chunks of content you could make inaccessible depending on a single dialogue choice.  I know you can't see everyting in a Spiderweb game in one run either, but I felt like in AoD there were too many things you could irreversably miss out on by saying one thing or the other, and it's a bigger deal when the world is so much smaller.  You could say this is balanced out by the game being shorter to complete but, if you like to play thoroughly it still takes quite a while, and it isn't satisfying to miss out on such a large number of things per playthrough.


-20 year old sprites look better than bad 3D and I have a strengthened understanding/appreciation for your equipment not showing up on your avatar in Spiderweb games.  AoD had some nice environments but some ugly characters.  




tldr: Age of Decadence scratches the itch and is worth picking up during the sale, but Spiderweb games are still better.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...