Well-Actually War Trall Ash Lael Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I've been thinking of hosting a NI game over AIM this weekend. Two main reasons. First, the fast pace would make for a very exciting, fun game. Secondly, I think that with all the work Stareye has put in on this game, it's about time someone else hosted one and gave him a chance to actually play this beast. The game would last up to 3 and a half hours (or less, if it takes as few turns as these have been taking), with half an hour per turn. All action timers would be reset at the start of each new "day" to ease keeping track. Rules would be almost exactly the same otherwise. Sixteen players might be ambitious, but I'm willing to give it a go. I'm posting to see if people are up for this. If there's interest I'll set a precise time and start taking registrations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast *i Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Cool. While I have to go to work soon, the first thought is to simplify it. The issue right now is the large number of variables associated with running this game. The most time consuming part for me is the record keeping. Anything you can do to cut back would be a good thing. I have a few ideas to help: * Game is based on rounds, not the quasi-continuous. One action per round. * Use only the simpler roles. * No faction joining. * No items. I'll think about this some more and offer suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Mea Tulpa Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 You'll have to work hard to find a time that works for 16 people. As Ephesos discovered, schedules and time zones are not always aligned well; also, some people may sign up and then not be able to come, or may come late, despite their best intentions to show up on time. Anyway, I think 16 may be overly ambitious. In the heyday of SW chats we rarely got more than 15 or 16, but that was drawing from a much larger crowd of potential chatters, probably 40+ users, and they didn't have to commit 3+ hours to the chats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrulous Glaahk Sporefrog Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Yeah, it sounds like aiming for 10 might be more reasonable. That being said, I'm definitely in anytime, and I bet Andraste would be too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unflappable Drayk Marlenny Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 It should be obvious that Ash meant he was willing to moderate up to 16 players, not that he was expecting 16 players to sign up. I'd probably take on Stareye's ideas. I'm not sure if you should get rid of all the items, but certainly cut it down to just a few. Needlessly to say, I'm in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotghroth Rhapsody RCCCL Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Depending on the date and time, I'd give it a go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Ash Lael Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Hmm. The idea doesn't seem to be generating a lot of heat. I guess I won't go ahead with it. However, I am still willing to moderate game 5 if Stareye wants a turn playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts