Jump to content

Frobozz

Member
  • Posts

    118
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Frobozz

  1. What you should do is write a program that puts adds the custom sounds when ran and when ran again removes them. Them we wouldn't have to go in and fiddle with the thing by hand which is kinda slow.

     

    Or you could spam Jeff with email until he agrees to add support. laugh

  2. Quote:
    Originally written by Newtfeet:
    This code is portable. The only problem is I need the professional version of REALbasic in order to build a Windows version. And that costs around $400, last I checked.
    Not according to what I have read. You only need the professional version if you are going to compile Windows applications from a Macintosh computer. If you have a computer with Windows than you can just buy the standard version and use that.
  3. Quote:
    Originally written by Newtfeet:
    I, for one, am glad that somewhere there is a place where Macs get higher priority. It wouldn't be impossible for me to make a Windows version; just expensive.
    I don't have anything against Mac users (I even had one once). However, I like to see code written to be as portable as possible. Why? Because it is annoying to have to change to another computer whenever you want to run a particular program. frown

    Quote:
    Originally written by Newtfeet:
    Yeah; this isn't open source. It might be when I get bored and give up wink . Anyway, the source might not be useful; this isn't written in VB, C++, Java or Python. And what do you mean, "useless StuffIt format"? mad
    It would be far more useful than you would believe. I've programmed three of the languages you mentioned ( VB, C++, Java ) and others you have not mentioned. I doubt it would take long to port.

    Oh and StuffIt is useless because the vast majority of people cannot use it. And I don't think you should pay for the program to make them. Oh and if you are thinking I like zip, guess again. I prefer GZIP and TAR. Why? Because almost every archiver I've tried (WinZIP, 7Zip, StuffIt expander, Ark (Linux) ) can handle the formats.
  4. Even if I intended to add anything to the game files, they wouldn't have to be removed later since their presence would not affect other scenarios. I was mainly stating that if Jeff wanted to add sounds later on (say from future games he makes) that it would be extremely easy and therefore more likely of it happening.

     

    As it is I haven't the software to enable me to add anything even if I wanted to. frown

  5. I have a hunch the number of the sound effect is the number of it's position in the resource file. Other people might be able to add sounds to it and use a number to access that sound without having to modify the code.

     

    Now all we need is for somebody to test it. laugh

  6. Quote:
    Originally written by Walker White:
    There probably should be a movement to add some improvements to the editor -- but let's wait until Jeff most of the bugs out of the main program first.
    I agree. Plus we should wait until the Windows version of the editor has been released so that any changes we make can easily be added to that one also. wink
  7. No I'm afraid that won't do either. Notice the sign up section of ezrs.com, it says "Addresses provided by free E-mail sites are not acceptable (e.g. yahoo.com, hotmail.com ...)".

     

    I say somebody with a fast connection should just put a copy on their website (if they have one). Or else he should try Spidweb's ftp account again.

  8. Quote:
    Originally written by coreyh:
    The download I found for stuff expander on the aladdin website was bundled with trial version of stuffit and was 8 mb.
    Hate to say this, but you didn't need to download that big a file. I grabbed an outdated copy (6.0) and it was able to handle it. This one is only 2.4mb. laugh

    Grab it here: ftp://ftp.aladdinsys.com/pub/_old/pc/StuffIt_Expander/exp60.exe

    At anyrate... time to go download good ole MinGW. I wonder if this code can be compiled under Windows without too much effort.

    Edit: Okay scratch that idea.
  9. Quote:
    Originally written by Spidweb:
    "Not distributing the editor with the demo version would be a foolish thing to do anyway."

    Heh. You don't get to pay our bandwidth fees.
    That was my first guess.

    My second was file size reduction for people who don't particularly want the editor. Some people may just want to play scenarios. With the editor attached it probably would have been at the most 4mb bigger for 18mb. Nasty for even a 56k modem. frown
×
×
  • Create New...