Garrulous Glaahk Untamed Banana Slug Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 I tested magical efficiency to determine how efficient it actually is. Oooh, graph! http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y188/Red_Wizard/magefficiency.jpg Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Lilith Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 It's really not a bad skill (in A5; it was bad in A4). The trouble is that the prerequisites for it are sort of awkward to meet until quite late in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchling Cockatrice Randomizer Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Your line is over estimating efficiency at the high end. Jeff usually has a point of diminishing returns so it plateaus about 70% spell energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chittering Clawbug fractalnavel Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Originally Posted By: Randomizer Your line is over estimating efficiency at the high end. Jeff usually has a point of diminishing returns so it plateaus about 70% spell energy. With everything pushed to ridiculously high levels artificially, I have been able to cast spells using -0- spell points / energy, except for non-divine-retribution AoE spells, which seem completely unaffected. That line looks right to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgeoning Battle Gamma Puksis Posted September 11, 2009 Share Posted September 11, 2009 Actually your graphs slope should be A BIT higher, because there are more points on the left side. (And I think you should make it like a kind of recumbent parabola?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.