Easygoing Eyebeast Enraged Slith Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 I'm sorry to hear that but I hardly blame you. You'd think a community without the shield of anonymity would be a nicer place but I've only ever witnessed the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Understated Ur-Drakon Nioca Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Is this still going on? Anyway, TWO is no longer a 24 hour scenario. So... yeah, I'm out of the contest. Probably for the better though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Enraged Slith Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 It's going to on to get more entries. I had an entry until it passed the 24 hour mark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 *Cough* So, are we ready to wrap things up? If Lazarus can't judge, I guess I'll vollenteer if no one else wants to. But I think we should end this officially rather then let it die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 I volunteered to judge, way back when, and I will still do it if we ever move to wrap this up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrulous Glaahk The Knight Who Said Ni Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 As my scenario won't be ready in time, I will judge if you need one and trust me. I've been playing BOA since it came out and I have played EVERY scenario released too. If you need me PM me. Ni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 So, we have the following judges: Me Niemand Nikki Enraged Slith Maybe Dintiradan, Ephesos, and Lazarus. Thanks NI, but as you can see, we've got reviewers to spare That should be plenty for such a small contest. Are we all in an agreement to meet in an AIM chatroom to discuss the winner then? I'm good for any time this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Well, I for one have not looked at any of the entries yet, as I was waiting for there to be some organization to the judging process. I guess that was wishful thinking on my part. So, I'll get down to playing through them and taking some notes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Enraged Slith Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I was going to have an entry, but I think it's passed the mark at this point. Should be out this weekend, regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Am I correct that the list of entries is The Eternal, Incorruptible, and Turn That Frown Upside-down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk nikki. Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 That is correct, yes. Also, I don't think I should judge. Though I've played all three of the scenarios, I also made one, so I should probably stay away from the judging. Slithy: if you can get the entry out in the next few days (if this is the weekend you meant), and it still abides to the 24 hour limit, I don't see why we can't let you in. That'd be it though - no other entrants. This thing has dragged on for long enough as it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Swimmin' Salmon Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I would think the more judges the better. It's good to have a wide range of comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I suppose. If Ni wishes to still judge, then he should feel free too. So we ending this by next weekend? ES, will that be enough time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Ephesos Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I feel like trying to knock one out before the deadline, whenever that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easygoing Eyebeast Enraged Slith Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I just wanted everyone to know that I tried... twice. I'm fairly certain I'm over time. Plus, I've divvied that time over a few weeks, which I think defeats the purpose of this contest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Swimmin' Salmon Posted October 13, 2009 Share Posted October 13, 2009 Judges should prolly download the scenarios (in case of bug fixes) and start playing. I nominate Niemand as head field judge, and E.S. as replay booth official. Send your reports to them for crunching and compilation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 I'm not sure what there is too be gained from being so official. Would it not be better to just (re)play all the scenario's most recent versions and then meet up to discuse the winners? Complicating it like that well, put blunty, just seems stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 I would prefer a discussion among the judges, possibly to at that time determine how to award or assign rankings. With only three entries a rigid ranking doesn't necessarily seem required, and we had repeatedly discussed before making this contest less formal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Swimmin' Salmon Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Not much to be gained by delaying either. Glad to hear that the old BoA spirit is alive and well. And, strictly speaking, the football referee references were a bit tongue in cheek. Rather than argue semantics (BoA FTW!) why not just get to judging? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Well... 1) Niemand needs to finish playing all the scenarios 2) Not all of the judges have responded to confirm that they're judging. 3) We still need a time where we can all meet to discuse the winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Swimmin' Salmon Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 1 - He can opt to not read the emails sent to him in order to keep his opinions pure. 2 - You snooze, you lose. Put up, or shut up. Time waits for no man. 3 - 6 pm on Saturday of this week. Really, no need to delay. There are leaders, and there are hooks. Also, line, rods, and reels. But that is a different matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Acky Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Sorry, I didn't know a time was already set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well-Actually War Trall Niemand Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 I'll have easily finished playing the scenarios by this weekend, that's no issue. (And as Salmon noted I can just not read any reviews sent to me. I've been avoiding the ones on the CSR for months now, and can continue to do so. As to the discussion time this weekend: Given the lack of a time zone specification, that could be almost any time. I'm assuming that Salmon meant Pacific U.S. time, which will probably work for me (I think that would make it 8 my time), depending on whether I meet with people to do homework that day and how long we keep working if I do. At the very worst I shouldn't be more than a bit late. With regard to a small number of judges: There are only three contestants, so we very much do not need a large number of judges. I see no reason to turn away anyone who volunteered to help with it, but neither do we need desperately to seek them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnificent Ornk Swimmin' Salmon Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 I set a random time which I knew would work for the majority of people. While difficult for our European friends, 6pm PST allows the antipodals a voice, as well as the Americans. With contests like this (especially this contest) it occasionally takes a bullwhip to make things move forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.